escritoireazul: (Default)
escritoireazul ([personal profile] escritoireazul) wrote2009-01-27 09:59 pm

(no subject)

I haven't talked about Supernatural much lately, mostly because I'm basically not watching this season. It's sitting on my dvr, but I'm so frustrated by season three that I just can't watch it yet. I've not rewatched seasons one or two, either, and in fact I loaned season one to [livejournal.com profile] nikitangel months ago and haven't bothered to get it back.

But I still have thoughts and issues with it, and my buttons are being pushed by the fact that GLAAD nominated "Ghostfacers" for Outstanding Individual Episode (in a series without a regular LGBT character). GLAAD, you know, Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation, nominated "GHOSTFACERS" for its portrayal of a gay character. (Hat tip to [livejournal.com profile] coffeeandink for the link.)

I have some issues with GLAAD anyway (for one thing, while I realize the awkwardness of GLBTQAAD or other variations, G&L doesn't actually include all that many potential members of the alliance. (I'm also not fond of "defamation" aligned with these awards, but that's a different conversation.)

I mean, the award tagline is this: 20th Annual GLAAD Media Awards. Fair. Accurate. Inclusive. And Impossibly Glam.

I'd like to know why they nominated "Ghostfacers" because the episode I saw was really none of those things. And GF is one of my favorite episodes of season three (which is saying something).

If you haven't seen the episode, summary below.



It's an episode with a frame I really like, or at least I like the idea; two geeky guys (introduced previously) are attempting to create a tv show about ghost hunters and ghost hunting (in part inspired by their previous interaction with Dean and Sam). They are pretty incompetent compared to Dean and Sam, and this episode is told through their point of view, so that awkwardness can be uncomfortable. There's a new character, Corbett, who is their intern. He's gay, and he has a crush on one of the geeks. (I can't remember which one - mostly because I can't remember their names. Mostly because their names don't really matter, even from their point of view, they are just The Geeks Who Get in the Way of Dean and Sam.) The geek is mostly oblivious to it.

Corbett's a pretty enjoyable character; he's a little too sweet for me, but he's nice, and smart, and quite heroic. As [livejournal.com profile] coffeeandink says, he's smart "except for his inexplicable crush, which just reads like a gay version of all the stories where some schlubby guy gets a gorgeous girl," which is a pretty accurate way to describe it.

Corbett, one of the very few gay characters we've seen on SPN (and, off the top of my head, I can't actually name another), dies. As gay characters do. And then The Geek convinces Corbett's ghost to save them by overcoming his own homophobia, or setting it aside, and kissing him.

I've seen two main interpretations of this. One is that The Geek is realizing that (despite the fact he's not gay, and pretty much ignored all of Corbett's attentions, now that he's dead, and unattainable, and in some ways safe, and also, can save their lives), he actually cares for Corbett. (Okay, so the parenthetical aside is more my interpretation of that one.)

The other, and the one I'm closer to, is that The Geek is lying to the gay guy ghost in order to save his own ass. You know, the gay guy dies so the straight guys can live. (I'm trying to remember if, when he saves them, he's further sacrificing himself as a ghost - so the gay ghost also dies so the straight guys can live. I can't remember how that worked, though.)

Shouldn't that part - where the only gay guy dies so the straight guys can live - disqualify it for a GLAAD award?


I call FAIL.

(I'd like to know why they nominated this episode, but I'd also like to know why Bones was ignored, based on the standard I can infer from this nomination.)

[identity profile] pene.livejournal.com 2009-01-28 03:46 am (UTC)(link)
It's like the whole act of kissing a man is enough of a sacrifice to warrant the geeks being saved. This combined with the devoted gay man in love with the straight man and the obvious gay man dies issues. So many reasons to shudder.

But I'm just reading about it, I didn't see it and haven't seen any eps of supernatural.

You're right about Bones. Perhaps Angela counts as a regular gay character? Though, of course, bisexuals don't count.

Off to get an Angela icon because I love her so.

[identity profile] escritoireazul.livejournal.com 2009-01-28 03:52 am (UTC)(link)
You're right about Bones. Perhaps Angela counts as a regular gay character? Though, of course, bisexuals don't count.

Probably she does, though there are categories for recurring gay characters.

Well, sort of. There isn't a category for individual episodes of shows with recurring gay characters, but there is this:

OUTSTANDING DRAMA SERIES
Brothers & Sisters (ABC)
The L Word (Showtime)
South of Nowhere (The N)
Torchwood (BBC America)
True Blood (HBO)

And maybe Bones can't compete with that, I don't know, I've only seen part of True Blood and nothing of any of the others.

But yeah, obviously bisexuals never count. They'll just choose men in the end, of course. Those pesky penises infect us and all.

[identity profile] ruffwriter.livejournal.com 2009-01-28 03:46 am (UTC)(link)
Eep. Yeah, I thought that episode was pretty problematic, too. This seems like it's probably more of a case of lack of selection than anything... which is still pretty depressing.

[identity profile] escritoireazul.livejournal.com 2009-01-28 03:54 am (UTC)(link)
That really is depressing, you're right.

Though, thinking about that, I worry that by nominating things which are so problematic, it just encourages further problematic media. Or maybe not encourages - validates? I'll have to think about this more. I mean, yes, I'm very aware of the lack of options, but I'm not sure that means I want to reward shows just because they include a gay character at all, no matter how problematic.

(Plus, I cringe at the thought of what some of the fandom might use this to justify when the next race/gender/sexuality discussion comes up.)

[identity profile] lilacsigil.livejournal.com 2009-01-28 03:58 am (UTC)(link)
Sarah Connor Chronicles had a terrific trans* character, for whom being a transwoman was not just part of the plot, but a survival mechanism and a force for humanity and good. I was really astonished and delighted. Maybe the dates didn't line up for that one? But SPN...um. At least it wasn't an Afterschool Special?

[identity profile] escritoireazul.livejournal.com 2009-01-28 04:03 am (UTC)(link)
Which season of SCC had the trans* character? I've only seen parts of last season, but this season is sitting on my dvr waiting for me. (This time simply because I haven't had time to watch it, not because I'm boycotting it like Supernatural.) It frustrates me that it wasn't nominated, then, and this crap was.

[identity profile] lilacsigil.livejournal.com 2009-01-28 04:22 am (UTC)(link)
It was the last episode before the break - season 2, episode 13. It's not 100% good, but it's head and shoulders above the usual representation of trans* characters on network TV.
ext_8719: (Default)

[identity profile] st-aurafina.livejournal.com 2009-01-28 04:23 am (UTC)(link)
I'm confused, too - I don't feel particularly comfortable with the mocking tone of the show whenever it was dealing with Corbett. I'm surprised that it could be seen as a positive portrayal at all.

And shame on them, for ignoring Bones, and Sarah Connor Chronicles. The Bones episode, where Angela talks to Booth, and we find out about Booth's aunt is one of my favourite things I've seen this year.

[identity profile] sanj.livejournal.com 2009-01-28 04:24 am (UTC)(link)
Bleah. Definitely fail. It was a total celluloid closet episode -- the only saving grace being that Sam and Dean kind of called the Ghostfacers on it when they screened the footage.

Sigh.
deifire: (Default)

[personal profile] deifire 2009-01-28 01:23 pm (UTC)(link)
I've got to go with [livejournal.com profile] coffeeandink's "Did you guys actually watch the episode?" I know there wasn't a lot on TV to choose from this year, but they could have found something better than that episode.

I've seen some epic fail in gay media award nominations in my short life, but this one might win for worst decision ever.